<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Go Big Always</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gobigalways.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gobigalways.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:44:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2645</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2645</guid>
		<description>Not that this addresses the main point, but ... how behind the curve is State farm _really_ ... look at the last bit of the second paragraph. The &quot;does not meet&quot; bit ... see something curious? &quot;... ourunderwriting guidelines&quot;.

That&#039;s the sort of typo that happens on a typewriter. Could it possibly be?
Just imagine someone sitting there, November 9, 2009, banging away at some venerable Selectric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that this addresses the main point, but &#8230; how behind the curve is State farm _really_ &#8230; look at the last bit of the second paragraph. The &#8220;does not meet&#8221; bit &#8230; see something curious? &#8220;&#8230; ourunderwriting guidelines&#8221;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the sort of typo that happens on a typewriter. Could it possibly be?<br />
Just imagine someone sitting there, November 9, 2009, banging away at some venerable Selectric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 (female) thought leaders, boiled down by Cambodia: an Inspiring Story of Survival with Thoughts from Beth Kanter &#171; PhilanthroPost</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/10-female-thought-leaders-boiled-down/comment-page-1/#comment-2644</link>
		<dc:creator>Cambodia: an Inspiring Story of Survival with Thoughts from Beth Kanter &#171; PhilanthroPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/10-female-thought-leaders-boiled-down/#comment-2644</guid>
		<description>[...] female bloggers (#29 on the list and the only one focused on the nonprofit sector) and appears on a top ten list of female thought leaders in social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] female bloggers (#29 on the list and the only one focused on the nonprofit sector) and appears on a top ten list of female thought leaders in social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Enterprise UI Summit Profile: Salesforce.com’s Craig Villamor by Enterprise UI Summit Recap &#171; Salesforce User Experience Blog</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/enterprise-ui-summit-profile-salesforcecom%e2%80%99s-craig-villamor/comment-page-1/#comment-2642</link>
		<dc:creator>Enterprise UI Summit Recap &#171; Salesforce User Experience Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=407#comment-2642</guid>
		<description>[...] p.s. Get my take on enterprise software UI in this Enterprise UI Summit attendee profile. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] p.s. Get my take on enterprise software UI in this Enterprise UI Summit attendee profile. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Numbers we track in our online/offline life by The value of Friends and Followers - Portal Solutions Blog - Mike Porter, Perficient</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/numbers-we-track-in-our-onlineoffline-life/comment-page-1/#comment-2636</link>
		<dc:creator>The value of Friends and Followers - Portal Solutions Blog - Mike Porter, Perficient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=607#comment-2636</guid>
		<description>[...] bring this up because Go Big Always has a post on the numbers and how meaningless they are.  I say hurrah for Sam Lawrence for putting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bring this up because Go Big Always has a post on the numbers and how meaningless they are.  I say hurrah for Sam Lawrence for putting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Blackbox Republic: &#8220;Velvet rope&#8221; socialnet targets niche social dating &#171; digiphile</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2635</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackbox Republic: &#8220;Velvet rope&#8221; socialnet targets niche social dating &#171; digiphile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 19:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2635</guid>
		<description>[...] at least where traditional business are concerned: as Lawrence shared on his blog, State Farm chose not to underwrite &#8220;social software that helps people meet online.&#8221; Lawrence says that an iPhone app is in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at least where traditional business are concerned: as Lawrence shared on his blog, State Farm chose not to underwrite &#8220;social software that helps people meet online.&#8221; Lawrence says that an iPhone app is in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Traian</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2624</link>
		<dc:creator>Traian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2624</guid>
		<description>@sam: is there any email I could contact you directly, for a private matter? or you can follow back twitter.com/roigeek and I&#039;ll send you a message. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sam: is there any email I could contact you directly, for a private matter? or you can follow back twitter.com/roigeek and I&#8217;ll send you a message. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Name Chris Nordyke</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2619</link>
		<dc:creator>Name Chris Nordyke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2619</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a State Farm agent, and social media adopter/enthusiast. As a State Farm agent, I&#039;d obviously love it if State Farm was open to writing any and all companies, unfortunately it doesn&#039;t make sense for all involved.

 If I had to guess,(and I&#039;m not speaking on behalf of the company) the big concern here is personal injury liability, or the opportunity for slander, libel and defamation of character. You may not think that&#039;s a concern, but it&#039;s a very real reality on social networks, and you as the webmaster are facilitating all of it. 

I agree that it would be great if the State Farm PR officer would comment with a first and last name, but frankly I think its pretty cool that he/she was &quot;listening&quot; and responding at all. A lot of corporations are actively broadcasting on facebook and twitter, but not as many actually listening and engaging. 

Good job @StateFarm. Keep your ear to the ground. Cheers, Chris Nordyke, Agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a State Farm agent, and social media adopter/enthusiast. As a State Farm agent, I&#8217;d obviously love it if State Farm was open to writing any and all companies, unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t make sense for all involved.</p>
<p> If I had to guess,(and I&#8217;m not speaking on behalf of the company) the big concern here is personal injury liability, or the opportunity for slander, libel and defamation of character. You may not think that&#8217;s a concern, but it&#8217;s a very real reality on social networks, and you as the webmaster are facilitating all of it. </p>
<p>I agree that it would be great if the State Farm PR officer would comment with a first and last name, but frankly I think its pretty cool that he/she was &#8220;listening&#8221; and responding at all. A lot of corporations are actively broadcasting on facebook and twitter, but not as many actually listening and engaging. </p>
<p>Good job @StateFarm. Keep your ear to the ground. Cheers, Chris Nordyke, Agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2618</guid>
		<description>I meant @statefarm, not @allstate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant @statefarm, not @allstate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2617</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting, and refreshing to see @allstate respond, given their justification into the conversation.  The only thing to make it better?  Use a trusted first/last name not just the corporate handle.  Having worked with a few financial services firms on social strategy, I can understand why a corporate handle only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting, and refreshing to see @allstate respond, given their justification into the conversation.  The only thing to make it better?  Use a trusted first/last name not just the corporate handle.  Having worked with a few financial services firms on social strategy, I can understand why a corporate handle only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on State Farm won&#8217;t underwrite social software? by Matthew</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/state-farm-wont-underwrite-social-software/comment-page-1/#comment-2614</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=625#comment-2614</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s unfortunate that insurance is not in the business of helping anyone other than themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s unfortunate that insurance is not in the business of helping anyone other than themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
