<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t dump on me: The 4 behaviors of the social web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Go Big Always - Where are the thought followers?</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1578</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Big Always - Where are the thought followers?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 01:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1578</guid>
		<description>[...] Go to any company and they&#8217;ll tell you they need to be doing more &#8220;thought leadership.&#8221; I cringe when I hear this. The message behind the message is that they really want a whitepaper or marketing program or something that sales can dump off on prospects. I&#8217;ve never met a prospect that thinks of this as thought leadership. If that&#8217;s really what people want, let&#8217;s just call it clearer and/or more marketing materials. I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;ve never run into any materials a company has created and thought, &#8220;wow, now that&#8217;s thought leadership.&#8221; Instead, I usually think, &#8220;Stop dumping on me.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Go to any company and they&#8217;ll tell you they need to be doing more &#8220;thought leadership.&#8221; I cringe when I hear this. The message behind the message is that they really want a whitepaper or marketing program or something that sales can dump off on prospects. I&#8217;ve never met a prospect that thinks of this as thought leadership. If that&#8217;s really what people want, let&#8217;s just call it clearer and/or more marketing materials. I don&#8217;t know about you, but I&#8217;ve never run into any materials a company has created and thought, &#8220;wow, now that&#8217;s thought leadership.&#8221; Instead, I usually think, &#8220;Stop dumping on me.&#8221; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Unrein</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Unrein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>Great post, Sam! You bring a difficult and fuzzy subject into focus.

@Guido Oswald I don't think that the Pearls can be forced or predicted individually, but action can be taken to make them more likely. The more participation you have going on the more opportunity there is for the Pearls to serendipitously form. The more Droplets, Readers and Distributors you have engaged the higher the chances of Pearls being created.

Just like the value measurement being the aggregate of grains of sand rather than big boulders, the value creation is probabilistic rather than deterministic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Sam! You bring a difficult and fuzzy subject into focus.</p>
<p>@Guido Oswald I don&#8217;t think that the Pearls can be forced or predicted individually, but action can be taken to make them more likely. The more participation you have going on the more opportunity there is for the Pearls to serendipitously form. The more Droplets, Readers and Distributors you have engaged the higher the chances of Pearls being created.</p>
<p>Just like the value measurement being the aggregate of grains of sand rather than big boulders, the value creation is probabilistic rather than deterministic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra &#187; From the Pipeline - 5.13.08</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra &#187; From the Pipeline - 5.13.08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>[...] Don’t dump on me: The 4 behaviors of the social web :: Go Big Always - an interesting breakdown of the different types of people who use or take part in the social web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Don’t dump on me: The 4 behaviors of the social web :: Go Big Always - an interesting breakdown of the different types of people who use or take part in the social web. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChinaMatt</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>ChinaMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Great post. Every time I join a new online social network it quickly degenerates into spam and poor behavior, thus forcing me to depart from something I would otherwise enjoy. I do wish that companies would take some of this wisdom into account before throwing their garbage around the Web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. Every time I join a new online social network it quickly degenerates into spam and poor behavior, thus forcing me to depart from something I would otherwise enjoy. I do wish that companies would take some of this wisdom into account before throwing their garbage around the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hutch carpenter</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>hutch carpenter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 21:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>Love this post Sam. Especially that Pearls are not singularly great posts (of which there always are), but are memes. Where people's minds are.  That's a great way to think about social media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love this post Sam. Especially that Pearls are not singularly great posts (of which there always are), but are memes. Where people&#8217;s minds are.  That&#8217;s a great way to think about social media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Evans</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Right on Sam. This gets to the core of Social Web and Social Media. It's about a  conversation based on an invitation, not a pitch based on an interruption. There is a role for interruptive (aka Traditional) ads, to be sure: in particular they pay for all of the free stuff we enjoy at places like MySpace. At the same, the savvy social participant is moving to personal control--over everything. The question quickly rising to the top of the marketing challenge ladder is "If I couldn't interrupt you, how would I reach you?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on Sam. This gets to the core of Social Web and Social Media. It&#8217;s about a  conversation based on an invitation, not a pitch based on an interruption. There is a role for interruptive (aka Traditional) ads, to be sure: in particular they pay for all of the free stuff we enjoy at places like MySpace. At the same, the savvy social participant is moving to personal control&#8211;over everything. The question quickly rising to the top of the marketing challenge ladder is &#8220;If I couldn&#8217;t interrupt you, how would I reach you?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Per Gia's comments -- those of us who've worked in financial markets know how to think in fractions of pennies. The overnight float on money is worth billions, accummulated by fractions of pennies. 

It's the collective value of those tiny parts that was evident at a great afternoon event at FASTforward '07 -- and the significance of the 'shift' in market economics (well, at least in the understanding of it -- the economics were always there). In the past, Disney was reported to have gone to lengths to protect their intellectual property by even suing a daycare for having unlicensed Disney characters painted on the walls. At the '07 event, it was clear Disney understood the value of 'free' -- letting it go only increases the value.

At FASTforward '08 one of the banners in the hall boldly stated, "Intellectual Property has the shelf life of a Banana" (http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/23/my-favorite-sign-from-fastforward/). As was clearly suggested by JP Rangaswami (http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/20/jp-rangaswami-british-telcom-discusses-the-new-polarization/) in a panel discussion, the cost of pursuing IP infringement is now generally greater than any resulting gains. Not only that but by the legislation process is typically longer than the complete lifecycle of any IP value.

Disney expressed serious attention to the value of 'distributors' and the need for brands to embrace and facilitate this new economy of brokers (as Amazon clearly leverages, pgph 5 http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/18/advertising-relic-of-inefficiency/) . In a brief presentation the Disney rep talked about their consideration of the different roles of those who participate as: floaters, swimmers and divers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per Gia&#8217;s comments &#8212; those of us who&#8217;ve worked in financial markets know how to think in fractions of pennies. The overnight float on money is worth billions, accummulated by fractions of pennies. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s the collective value of those tiny parts that was evident at a great afternoon event at FASTforward &#8216;07 &#8212; and the significance of the &#8217;shift&#8217; in market economics (well, at least in the understanding of it &#8212; the economics were always there). In the past, Disney was reported to have gone to lengths to protect their intellectual property by even suing a daycare for having unlicensed Disney characters painted on the walls. At the &#8216;07 event, it was clear Disney understood the value of &#8216;free&#8217; &#8212; letting it go only increases the value.</p>
<p>At FASTforward &#8216;08 one of the banners in the hall boldly stated, &#8220;Intellectual Property has the shelf life of a Banana&#8221; (http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/23/my-favorite-sign-from-fastforward/). As was clearly suggested by JP Rangaswami (http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/20/jp-rangaswami-british-telcom-discusses-the-new-polarization/) in a panel discussion, the cost of pursuing IP infringement is now generally greater than any resulting gains. Not only that but by the legislation process is typically longer than the complete lifecycle of any IP value.</p>
<p>Disney expressed serious attention to the value of &#8216;distributors&#8217; and the need for brands to embrace and facilitate this new economy of brokers (as Amazon clearly leverages, pgph 5 <a href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/18/advertising-relic-of-inefficiency/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2008/02/18/advertising-relic-of-inefficiency/</a>) . In a brief presentation the Disney rep talked about their consideration of the different roles of those who participate as: floaters, swimmers and divers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Andrews</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Hallelujah!
I work in advertising as an art director and always aim to keep it real.
Loved your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hallelujah!<br />
I work in advertising as an art director and always aim to keep it real.<br />
Loved your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fahey</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>@Gia I believe the sand analogy was from Chuck Hollis http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/03/justifying-soci.html when he was talking about justifying Social Software. 

Should spammers also get a mention or are these identified as Droplets i.e. those entities out to make a quick buck out of any new technology. They are usually clever in their approach and are often at the cutting edge of what is possible. They often bombard the medium with messages- subtle and not so subtle -  which can sometimes be Read, Distributed and Polished, by others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gia I believe the sand analogy was from Chuck Hollis <a href="http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/03/justifying-soci.html" rel="nofollow">http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/03/justifying-soci.html</a> when he was talking about justifying Social Software. </p>
<p>Should spammers also get a mention or are these identified as Droplets i.e. those entities out to make a quick buck out of any new technology. They are usually clever in their approach and are often at the cutting edge of what is possible. They often bombard the medium with messages- subtle and not so subtle -  which can sometimes be Read, Distributed and Polished, by others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oliver marks</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/dont-dump-on-me-the-4-behaviors-of-the-social-web/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>oliver marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=238#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Isn't is strange how somehow we can usually tell when someone is being real and coming from the heart? (Women are great at this). Sometimes that can be a little harder to pick up on the web in written word...but conversely when someone is working a press release masquerading as a commentary it often sticks out like a sore thumb.

There's also an interesting process where a concept becomes second, third..fiftieth hand and all conceptual development has been wrung out of it. I read earnest blog posts like that a lot, the overworked stone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t is strange how somehow we can usually tell when someone is being real and coming from the heart? (Women are great at this). Sometimes that can be a little harder to pick up on the web in written word&#8230;but conversely when someone is working a press release masquerading as a commentary it often sticks out like a sore thumb.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also an interesting process where a concept becomes second, third..fiftieth hand and all conceptual development has been wrung out of it. I read earnest blog posts like that a lot, the overworked stone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.799 seconds -->
