<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Ricky Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:44:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social software in law firms &#171; Enlightened tradition</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Social software in law firms &#171; Enlightened tradition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 14:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=442#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>[...] If we construe it strictly, this usage profile should mean that no wiki can succeed if it serves less than 100 people (since a fraction of a person would be required otherwise). Some enterprise wikis might cover a much smaller group than this (such as a client-focused knowledge-sharing wiki where the client team is only 50 lawyers or so). However, if a single person were to support more than one wiki, their efforts could sustain 99 people overall. This leads me to the (I think inexorable) conclusion that we should focus our wiki efforts on areas where there are keen contributors rather than those where we could see a significant RoI, but no obvious wiki leaders. This appears a little counter-intuitive, and would need some nifty footwork to convince Ricky Revenue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If we construe it strictly, this usage profile should mean that no wiki can succeed if it serves less than 100 people (since a fraction of a person would be required otherwise). Some enterprise wikis might cover a much smaller group than this (such as a client-focused knowledge-sharing wiki where the client team is only 50 lawyers or so). However, if a single person were to support more than one wiki, their efforts could sustain 99 people overall. This leads me to the (I think inexorable) conclusion that we should focus our wiki efforts on areas where there are keen contributors rather than those where we could see a significant RoI, but no obvious wiki leaders. This appears a little counter-intuitive, and would need some nifty footwork to convince Ricky Revenue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gia Lyons</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-1974</link>
		<dc:creator>Gia Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 14:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=442#comment-1974</guid>
		<description>I think Ricky is an Angler Fish. http://www.dangerouswildlife.com/images/anglerfish.jpg

Comic strip! Yes! Isn&#039;t Sig into graphic novels anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ricky is an Angler Fish. <a href="http://www.dangerouswildlife.com/images/anglerfish.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.dangerouswildlife.com/images/anglerfish.jpg</a></p>
<p>Comic strip! Yes! Isn&#8217;t Sig into graphic novels anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-1973</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=442#comment-1973</guid>
		<description>Is Ricky a deep sea creature?  I&#039;ve met Ricky Revenue many times, he often reports to the COO, or is doing web marketing measurement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Ricky a deep sea creature?  I&#8217;ve met Ricky Revenue many times, he often reports to the COO, or is doing web marketing measurement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Mell</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/introducing-ricky-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Mell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 12:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=442#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>&quot;The best thing about Ricky is that he’s your best friend if you can bring him along with your plan. But he can be your biggest obstacle if you leave him out of the picture.&quot;

Very very true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The best thing about Ricky is that he’s your best friend if you can bring him along with your plan. But he can be your biggest obstacle if you leave him out of the picture.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very very true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
