<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Juicy tidbits from yesterday&#8217;s Jeopardy!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: white label social networks, what&#8217;s the future? &#171; Social Networks for Everyone!! Blog</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1487</link>
		<dc:creator>white label social networks, what&#8217;s the future? &#171; Social Networks for Everyone!! Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1487</guid>
		<description>[...] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive’s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive’s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandra Larsson</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Actually, Documentum have had discussion threads on their documents (objects) for some time through their add-on Documentum Collaborative Edition (DCE). However, it is not until now (Magellan and to some degree the new  WebTop/DAM) that the user interface makes sense :) But from my standpoint a convergence absolutely makes sense - we have had too many stovepipes of information over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Documentum have had discussion threads on their documents (objects) for some time through their add-on Documentum Collaborative Edition (DCE). However, it is not until now (Magellan and to some degree the new  WebTop/DAM) that the user interface makes sense <img src='http://gobigalways.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> But from my standpoint a convergence absolutely makes sense - we have had too many stovepipes of information over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen, John, and Ajay on the future of White Label Social Networks &#171; Social Media.Online Games.Virtual Worlds</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen, John, and Ajay on the future of White Label Social Networks &#171; Social Media.Online Games.Virtual Worlds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1401</guid>
		<description>[...] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive’s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive’s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carmen, John, and Ajay on the future of White Label Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Carmen, John, and Ajay on the future of White Label Social Networks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 20:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>[...] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive&#8217;s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] who participated it was hard to narrow down to these choices. Speaking of games, I was part of Jive&#8217;s Jeapardy game, where I scored last place, a mere $200 Jive bucks and Bill Johnston won the game! Jive is a client [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Social Software Jeopardy: See me in action! &#171; Bill Johnston: Online Community Strategy</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1393</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Social Software Jeopardy: See me in action! &#171; Bill Johnston: Online Community Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 19:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1393</guid>
		<description>[...] Sam has an excellent write up here: Juicy tidbits from yesterday’s Jeopardy! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sam has an excellent write up here: Juicy tidbits from yesterday’s Jeopardy! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1392</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1392</guid>
		<description>Guess my last comment didn't make it through -- any interest in sharing the responses to these great questions?

http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess my last comment didn&#8217;t make it through &#8212; any interest in sharing the responses to these great questions?</p>
<p><a href="http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html" rel="nofollow">http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>@Paula Thanks for the great comments. (And btw, I'm  not surprised at "the Enterprise focus" at all, just the levels of it given the event and speakers). 

@Sonny Glad you got something out of it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paula Thanks for the great comments. (And btw, I&#8217;m  not surprised at &#8220;the Enterprise focus&#8221; at all, just the levels of it given the event and speakers). </p>
<p>@Sonny Glad you got something out of it. <img src='http://gobigalways.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula Thornton</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1390</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Thornton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1390</guid>
		<description>1. The question about Training? RU kidding me? New wine, old bottle, sour results.
2. Surprised that you're surprised over the Enterprise focus. Enterprise 2.0 potential is the one thing that could shift the GDP the furthest the fastest and everyone is still yawning over it. Why? Because the related waste that's going on routinely in business today is all below the radar, because no one is responsible -- finance guys are focused elsewhere and where's the department for productivity, save on the manufacturing floor? Did we all forget that modern business models grew from the manufacturing era and have never adapted to the information era?
3. How would you compare/contrast the Enterprise Octopus to the Giant Hairball?
4. The request for Hard facts? What is it about 2.0 that people are not understanding as to 'there are no right answers' and 'all right answers are relevant to your own situation' (i.e. mileage will vary)? It's about trying and getting your own evidence to support.
5. Reference to "just another tool to remember". Let's say it loud and clear one more time for the unaware: It's not about the technology. If you're not leveraging this stuff in a grand connected design, you'll fail. This isn't an out-of-the-box proposition. Indeed, this is the box-counter-culture. Whatever you have in place, plan to blow up the interface, because it's likely wrong for your situation. The problem is that too often people throw out the baby with the bathwater (e.g. not leverage sound functions under the covers) and just 'try' swapping out not-so-good-technology-A with not-so-good-technology-B. Can we stop the madness?
6. "How long does it take for a community to take off?" Odd how the framing of the questions themselves illustrate the lack of understanding. Communities don't take off -- they already exist. We're just providing an infrastructure to further facilitate them. Start with the reality, stop trying to create one.

This is exhausting...enough for now, I'm losing my voice with all this internal screaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. The question about Training? RU kidding me? New wine, old bottle, sour results.<br />
2. Surprised that you&#8217;re surprised over the Enterprise focus. Enterprise 2.0 potential is the one thing that could shift the GDP the furthest the fastest and everyone is still yawning over it. Why? Because the related waste that&#8217;s going on routinely in business today is all below the radar, because no one is responsible &#8212; finance guys are focused elsewhere and where&#8217;s the department for productivity, save on the manufacturing floor? Did we all forget that modern business models grew from the manufacturing era and have never adapted to the information era?<br />
3. How would you compare/contrast the Enterprise Octopus to the Giant Hairball?<br />
4. The request for Hard facts? What is it about 2.0 that people are not understanding as to &#8216;there are no right answers&#8217; and &#8216;all right answers are relevant to your own situation&#8217; (i.e. mileage will vary)? It&#8217;s about trying and getting your own evidence to support.<br />
5. Reference to &#8220;just another tool to remember&#8221;. Let&#8217;s say it loud and clear one more time for the unaware: It&#8217;s not about the technology. If you&#8217;re not leveraging this stuff in a grand connected design, you&#8217;ll fail. This isn&#8217;t an out-of-the-box proposition. Indeed, this is the box-counter-culture. Whatever you have in place, plan to blow up the interface, because it&#8217;s likely wrong for your situation. The problem is that too often people throw out the baby with the bathwater (e.g. not leverage sound functions under the covers) and just &#8216;try&#8217; swapping out not-so-good-technology-A with not-so-good-technology-B. Can we stop the madness?<br />
6. &#8220;How long does it take for a community to take off?&#8221; Odd how the framing of the questions themselves illustrate the lack of understanding. Communities don&#8217;t take off &#8212; they already exist. We&#8217;re just providing an infrastructure to further facilitate them. Start with the reality, stop trying to create one.</p>
<p>This is exhausting&#8230;enough for now, I&#8217;m losing my voice with all this internal screaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Hollis</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1389</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Hollis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1389</guid>
		<description>Hey Sam -- BRILLIANT!

I felt that the questions were SO GOOD, I just had to weigh in.

Hope you don't mind

http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Sam &#8212; BRILLIANT!</p>
<p>I felt that the questions were SO GOOD, I just had to weigh in.</p>
<p>Hope you don&#8217;t mind</p>
<p><a href="http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html" rel="nofollow">http://chucksblog.typepad.com/a_journey_in_social_media/2008/05/jeopardy-afterm.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny Gill</title>
		<link>http://gobigalways.com/juicy-tidbits-from-yesterdays-jeopardy/#comment-1386</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gobigalways.com/?p=292#comment-1386</guid>
		<description>Fun and informative event! Got to watch it last night and received some good information from everyone, especially on the standpoint of internal strategies.

Nice work Trebek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun and informative event! Got to watch it last night and received some good information from everyone, especially on the standpoint of internal strategies.</p>
<p>Nice work Trebek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 5.769 seconds -->
